Β§

In re Vernon Hills, Inc.

348 F.2d 4 (7th Cir. 1965)
In re Vernon Hills, Inc.

3 Citing cases

  1. Federal Savings and Loan Ins. Corp. v. Hogan

    476 F.2d 1182 (7th Cir. 1973)   Cited 22 times

    The Special Master's findings were approved by both the District Court and this Court. In re Vernon Hills, Inc., 348 F.2d 4 (7th Cir. 1965).

  2. Federal Savings Loan Ins. Corp. v. Szarabajka

    330 F. Supp. 1202 (N.D. Ill. 1971)   Cited 31 times
    Finding that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's conclusion that the defendant's "fraudulent procurement of the original loan made the refinancing of it clearly foreseeable, and thus part of the entire conspiracy"

    His Report and Recommendations (submitted May 25, 1964), upon which Hogan now relies, was affirmed and approved in its entirety by the district court. In the Matter of Vernon Hills, Inc., No. 62 B 9719 (N.D.Ill. 1964), and affirmed on appeal, 348 F.2d 4 (7th Cir. 1965). Hogan relies in particular upon ΒΆ 9 of Part I of the special master's report:

  3. Balark v. Curtin

    655 F.2d 798 (7th Cir. 1981)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that plaintiff was entitled to attorney fees incurred in collecting civil-rights judgment

    Defendants' burden on the reformation question is a heavy one. Defendants must establish by clear and convincing evidence that the instrument does not express the intent of the parties.In re Vernon Hills, Inc., 348 F.2d 4, 9 (7th Cir. 1965). See also Aetna Insurance Co. v. Paddock, 301 F.2d 807 (5th Cir. 1962); Timber Investors, Inc. v. United States, 587 F.2d 472 (Ct.Cl. 1978).