From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Venkatraman

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 31, 2022
No. 05-22-00261-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 31, 2022)

Opinion

05-22-00261-CV

03-31-2022

IN RE VENKY VENKATRAMAN, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-11968

Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE

In his March 28, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus, relator challenges the trial court's order denying his objections to the child support liens. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that he has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

After reviewing the petition and the record, we conclude that relator has not shown his entitlement to the relief requested.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Venkatraman

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 31, 2022
No. 05-22-00261-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 31, 2022)
Case details for

In re Venkatraman

Case Details

Full title:IN RE VENKY VENKATRAMAN, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

No. 05-22-00261-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 31, 2022)