From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Velocys Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 4, 2016
2016-1294 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1294

10-04-2016

IN RE: VELOCYS CORP., Appellant

FRANK ROSENBERG, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/763,336.

JUDGMENT

FRANK ROSENBERG, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O'MALLEY, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 4, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Velocys Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 4, 2016
2016-1294 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2016)
Case details for

In re Velocys Corp.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: VELOCYS CORP., Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 4, 2016

Citations

2016-1294 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2016)