From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Veitch

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 13, 2013
216 N.J. 162 (N.J. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-13

In the Matter of W.R. VEITCH, a/k/a, W. Richard Veitch, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 250801971).


CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13–051, concluding that W.R. VEITCH, a/k/a W. RICHARD VEITCH, of NEW BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, should be censured for violating RPC 4.2 (in representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should know to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, absent the other lawyer's consent, authorization by law, or court order), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that W.R. VEITCH, a/k/a W. RICHARD VEITCH, is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Veitch

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 13, 2013
216 N.J. 162 (N.J. 2013)
Case details for

In re Veitch

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of W.R. VEITCH, a/k/a, W. Richard Veitch, an Attorney at Law…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Nov 13, 2013

Citations

216 N.J. 162 (N.J. 2013)
77 A.3d 1188

Citing Cases

In re Vazquez

ho, in one of six bankruptcy matters, communicated directly with the client about a disgorgement order in the…

In re Smith

n that the grievant was represented by counsel; the communications involved the subject of the…