From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vaxart, Inc. Sec. Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 25, 2023
3:20-cv-05949-VC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)

Opinion

3:20-cv-05949-VC

01-25-2023

In re VAXART, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS


CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 54(b)

VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1. In accordance with and subject to the Stipulation and Agreement of [Partial] Settlement in this matter dated July 27, 2022 (the “Stipulation”) (ECF No. 224-2), the claims asserted in the abovecaptioned securities class action are hereby (a) DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Settling Defendant Vaxart, Inc. (“Vaxart”) and (b) DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to additional Settling Defendants Andrei Floroiu, Wouter Latour, Todd Davis, Michael Finney, Robert Yedid, and Sean Tucker, but only in their capacities as current or former officers or directors of Vaxart.

2. Pursuant to Rule 54(b), the Court directs the entry of this final judgment as to each of the above-referenced Settling Defendants, having determined that there is no just reason for delay.

3. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment, the Court reserves jurisdiction over Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class, and the Settling Defendants, as those terms are defined in the Stipulation, as to all matters concerning administration, consummation, and enforcement of the Stipulation.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

In re Vaxart, Inc. Sec. Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 25, 2023
3:20-cv-05949-VC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)
Case details for

In re Vaxart, Inc. Sec. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re VAXART, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 25, 2023

Citations

3:20-cv-05949-VC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)