Opinion
No. 18-2104
06-12-2018
IN RE: EVARISTO SERRANO VARGAS, Petitioner
DLD-231
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 3-17-cv-00801) Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
June 7, 2018
Before: JORDAN, SHWARTZ and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges OPINION PER CURIAM
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. --------
Evaristo Serrano Vargas filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the District Court to rule on a petition that he had filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The District Court has since ruled on Serrano Vargas's § 2241 petition. In light of the District Court's action, the question Serrano Vargas presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will dismiss his mandamus petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir. 1992).