From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vanwinkle

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 29, 2010
No. 02-10-00332-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 29, 2010)

Opinion

No. 02-10-00332-CV

Delivered: November 29, 2010.

Original Proceeding.

PANEL: McCOY, GARDNER, and MEIER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

We make no determination regarding the trial court's failure to rule on Relator's "Declaration of Conflict Between Attorney and Client and Motion for Substitution of Appointed Counsel" because Relator has not specifically sought relief as to that motion.


Summaries of

In re Vanwinkle

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 29, 2010
No. 02-10-00332-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 29, 2010)
Case details for

In re Vanwinkle

Case Details

Full title:IN RE MICHAEL ROBERT VANWINKLE, RELATOR

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Nov 29, 2010

Citations

No. 02-10-00332-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 29, 2010)