Opinion
SC 164251 SC 164252SC 164253 COA 353319COA 353320 COA 356664
07-28-2022
In re GUARDIANSHIP OF DAVID P. VanPOPPELEN. v. SHANE CHILDERS, Successor Guardian for DAVID P. VanPOPPELEN, Appellee. DENNIS J. VanPOPPELEN, Petitioner, and IVY S. VanPOPPELEN, Appellant, In re CONSERVATORSHIP OF DAVID P. VanPOPPELEN. VINCENT W.VanPOPPELEN, Petitioner, and IVY S. VanPOPPELEN, Appellant, v. SHANE CHILDERS, Successor Conservator for DAVID P. VanPOPPELEN, Appellee. In re CONSERVATORSHIP OF DAVID P. VanPOPPELEN. VINCENT W.VanPOPPELEN, Petitioner, and IVY S. VanPOPPELEN, Appellant, v. SHANE CHILDERS, Successor Conservator for DAVID P. VanPOPPELEN, WYATT R. VanPOPPELEN, and JUNE VanPOPPELEN, Appellees.
Macomb PC: 2017-223825-GA, PC: 2017-223826-CA, PC: 2017-223826-CA
Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices
ORDER
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 2022 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.