From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Van Siclen

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 3, 2017
D-140 (N.J. Oct. 3, 2017)

Opinion

D-140 079364

10-03-2017

IN THE MATTER OF TODD DAVIS VAN SICLEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No. 025912000)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-274, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14, TODD DAVIS VAN SICLIN of CRANFORD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2000, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years based on discipline imposed in the State of New York for unethical conduct that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 1.7(a)(2)(prohibiting a lawyer from representing a client if there is a significant risk that the representation will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer), and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that TODD DAVIS VAN SICLEN is suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years, effective November 3, 2017, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule 1:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(d); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

WITNESS, the Honorable Stuart Rabner, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 3rd day of October, 2017.

/s/

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT


Summaries of

In re Van Siclen

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 3, 2017
D-140 (N.J. Oct. 3, 2017)
Case details for

In re Van Siclen

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF TODD DAVIS VAN SICLEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Oct 3, 2017

Citations

D-140 (N.J. Oct. 3, 2017)