From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Van Dam

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 12, 2006
899 A.2d 294 (N.J. 2006)

Opinion

June 12, 2006


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-030, concluding that DAVID H. VAN DAM of WAYNE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8(c) (a lawyer shall not prepare an instrument giving the lawyer or a person related to the lawyer as parent, child, sibling or spouse any substantial gift from a client, including a testamentary gift, except where the client is related to the donee), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID H. VAN DAM is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Van Dam

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 12, 2006
899 A.2d 294 (N.J. 2006)
Case details for

In re Van Dam

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DAVID H. VAN DAM, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 12, 2006

Citations

899 A.2d 294 (N.J. 2006)
899 A.2d 294

Citing Cases

In re Weil

bequest and recommended that she obtain another attorney to draft the will; when she insisted on his…

In re Solny

See, In the Matter of Robert F. Spencer, DRB 08-068 (May 30, 2008) (admonition for attorney who prepared a…