From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vallas v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2003
304 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2252

April 8, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered April 4, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of respondent Board of Trustees denying petitioner accident disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Jeffrey L. Goldberg, for petitioner-appellant.

Marta Ross, for respondents-respondents.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Williams, Lerner, JJ.


The statutory presumption in petitioner's favor that her heart condition, first diagnosed several years after she joined respondent Department's employ in October 1990, was sustained as a result of her employment (see General Municipal Law § 207-k), was rebutted by evidence competent to support the Medical Board's conclusion that petitioner suffered from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy unaccompanied by coronary artery disease or hypertension. Accordingly, petitioner's application for accident disability retirement benefits was properly denied (see Goldman v. McGuire, 101 A.D.2d 768, 770, affd 64 N.Y.2d 1041 for reasons stated below).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Vallas v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2003
304 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In re Vallas v. Safir

Case Details

Full title:IN RE MARTHA VALLAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. HOWARD SAFIR, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 8, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 46

Citing Cases

O'Connor v. Bratton

The Medical Board adequately rebutted the presumption under the Heart Bill by relying on the findings of…

Kersellius v. Bratton

For a disabling condition caused by diseases of the heart of unknown origin, the lack of coronary artery…