Opinion
Cause number: 01-15-00566-CV
08-18-2015
In re Valero Refining - Texas, L.P., Relator
ORDER ON MOTION
Type of motion: First Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Brief Parties filing motion: Real Parties in Interest Vernon Fox and Mikki Fox Document to be filed: Response to Mandamus Petition Is appeal accelerated? Yes (mandamus). If motion to extend time:
Original due date: August 10, 2015
Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: August 10, 2015
Date Requested: September 9, 2015 Ordered that motion is:
[v] Granted
If document is to be filed, document due: September 9, 2015.
[v] No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
[ ] Denied
[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
[v] Other: __________
Given counsel's previously-planned vacation and the voluminous record, the real parties in interest's unopposed motion for an extension to file their response to the mandamus petition until September 9, 2015, is granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 10.3(a)(2),10.5(b)(1). However, counsel is warned that no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances because this is a mandamus petition.
[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court
Date: August 18, 2015 November 7, 2008 Revision