In re Uber Techs. Passenger Sexual Assault Litig.

Full title: IN RE UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PASSENGER SEXUAL ASSAULT LITIGATION This…

Court: United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 4, 2024

3:23-md-03084-CRB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-md-03084-CRB

03-04-2024

IN RE UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PASSENGER SEXUAL ASSAULT LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS

HON. LISA J. CISNEROS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION - TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S MATERIAL SHOULD BE FILED UNDER SEAL

HON. LISA J. CISNEROS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

Plaintiffs have filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Filed Under Seal (“Plaintiffs' Motion”), ECF 291, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5. Plaintiffs' Motion identified two exhibits to the Declaration of Sarah R. London, ECF 2913 and ECF 291-4, as potentially containing confidential information regarding Defendants.

On March 1, 2024, Defendants filed a statement and declaration in support of sealing the exhibits to the London Declaration.

Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' request that the exhibits to the London Declaration shall remain sealed and ORDERS that the following material shall be sealed:

DOCUMENT	PORTION TO BE SEALED	DESCRIPTION
Exhibit A to the London Decl.	Sealed in its entirety	Confidential settlement agreement and release of all claims between Uber and Peiffer Wolf client
Exhibit B to the London Decl.	Sealed in its entirety	Exemplar confidential settlement agreement and release of claims

IT IS SO ORDERED.