Opinion
55,439-CW
08-31-2023
J. GARLAND SMITH & ASSOCIATES JAMES GARLAND SMITH AND MCCONNELL LAW GROUP, LLC JASMYNE ASTARRI MCCONNELL COUNSEL FOR: MATTIE JACKSON, TUTRIX NEAL LAW FIRM MARK JEFFREY NEAL AND HUDSON, POTTS & BERNSTEIN ROBERT MCCULLER BALDWIN COUNSEL FOR: NATASHA SPIVEY AND TEAIRRA SMITH
RECEIVED: BY HAND 07/11/23
ON APPLICATION OF MATTIE JACKSON, TUTRIX FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT IN NO. 20223755, CV3 ON THE DOCKET OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, PARISH OF OUACHITA, JUDGE WILSON RAMBO.
J. GARLAND SMITH & ASSOCIATES JAMES GARLAND SMITH AND MCCONNELL LAW GROUP, LLC JASMYNE ASTARRI MCCONNELL COUNSEL FOR: MATTIE JACKSON, TUTRIX
NEAL LAW FIRM MARK JEFFREY NEAL AND HUDSON, POTTS & BERNSTEIN ROBERT MCCULLER BALDWIN COUNSEL FOR: NATASHA SPIVEY AND TEAIRRA SMITH
Before STEPHENS, THOMPSON, and MARCOTTE, JJ.
WRIT DENIED.
The applicant, Mattie Jackson, seeks supervisory review of the trial court's May 15, 2023, ruling denying Jackson's exceptions of no right of action and no cause of action, staying the proceedings, and maintaining a preliminary injunction against Jackson. On the showing made, the writ is denied. U.R.C.A. 4-5.