From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Turgeon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 23, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-23-2017

In the Matter of Evan Nathaniel TURGEON, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 5028170).

Evan Nathaniel Turgeon, Falls Church, Virginia, pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Evan Nathaniel Turgeon, Falls Church, Virginia, pro se.Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, CLARK, MULVEY and AARONS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Evan Nathaniel Turgeon was admitted to practice by this Court in 2012 and has previously listed a business address in Washington, DC with the Office of Court Administration. By sworn affidavit filed with this Court on July 22, 2016, Turgeon seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a] ). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney.

At the time that his application was filed with this Court, Turgeon was in violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 since he had failed to fulfill his biennial registration requirements within 30 days of his 2016 birthday. Notably, this violation has not been cured to date. Inasmuch as Turgeon is therefore subject to potential disciplinary action (see Judiciary Law § 468–a[5] ; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 8.4[d]; see also Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1021 [2014]; Matter of Arms, 251 A.D.2d 743, 743–744, 674 N.Y.S.2d 156 [1998] ; Matter of Ryan, 238 A.D.2d 713, 713–714, 656 N.Y.S.2d 444 [1997] ; Matter of Farley, 205 A.D.2d 874, 874–875, 613 N.Y.S.2d 458 [1994] ), he is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and his application must be denied (see Matter of Cluff, ––– A.D.3d –––, 47 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ). Further, any future application by Turgeon must be supported by proof of his full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468–a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (see Matter of Frank, 146 A.D.3d 1228, 1228–1229, 46 N.Y.S.3d 434 [2017] ).

ORDERED that Evan Nathaniel Turgeon's application for permission to resign is denied.

McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, CLARK, MULVEY and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Turgeon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 23, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re Turgeon

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Evan Nathaniel TURGEON, an Attorney. (Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 23, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 1458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
48 N.Y.S.3d 899

Citing Cases

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Verheyden (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A.)

Here, respondent failed to submit a sworn affidavit as is required under both the Uniform Rules for Attorney…

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Smith (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A.)

Here, respondent failed to submit a sworn affidavit as is required under both the Uniform Rules for Attorney…