From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tunney

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 8, 2005
185 N.J. 398 (N.J. 2005)

Opinion

December 8, 2005


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-290, concluding that JOHN A. TUNNEY of WOODBRIDGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, and who thereafter was suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, effective October 29, 2004, by Order of the Court filed on October 1, 2004, should be suspended from practice for a concurrent period of six months for conduct in violation of RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client) and RPC 1.16(a)(2) (failure to withdraw from representation when physical or mental condition materially impairs lawyer's ability to represent client);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN A. TUNNEY be suspended from the practice law for a period of six months, effective October 29, 2004, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Tunney

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 8, 2005
185 N.J. 398 (N.J. 2005)
Case details for

In re Tunney

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOHN A. TUNNEY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 8, 2005

Citations

185 N.J. 398 (N.J. 2005)
886 A.2d 1054

Citing Cases

In re Proskurchenko

communicate with the client, and failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities in both matters; attorney…

In re McWhirkan

rney who was found guilty of misconduct in ten client matters: gross neglect, lack of diligence, and failure…