From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re TT-Fountains of Tomball, Ltd.

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Jan 11, 2016
Appellate case number: 01-15-00817-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 11, 2016)

Opinion

Appellate case number: 01-15-00817-CV

01-11-2016

In re TT-Fountains of Tomball, Ltd., incorrectly named as MBS Fountains of Tomball, Ltd. d/b/a Fountains of Tomball, and Henry S. Miller Realty Management, LLC, Relators


ORDER Trial court case number: 2014-00998 Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

On September 28, 2015, this Court denied the motion for temporary stay of the February 8, 2016 trial setting filed by Relators, TT-Fountains of Tomball, Ltd., incorrectly named as MBS Fountains of Tomball, Ltd. d/b/a Fountains of Tomball, and Henry S. Miller Realty Management, LLC. This Court's order denied the motion because, among other reasons, Relators had already served their amended discovery responses and the trial setting was more than four months away from the date of the Relators' petition for a writ of mandamus. This Court's order also requested a response from the real party in interest, Laurie Mejia-Rosa, to Relators' mandamus petition which seeks to vacate the respondent trial judge's September 15, 2015 order denying Relators' second amended motion to withdraw and amend deemed admissions in the underlying personal injury suit filed by the real party in interest.

On December 12, 2015, after counsel for the real party in interest received an extension of time due to an alleged lack of notice of the petition, he filed a notice of appearance and a response. On December 18, 2015, Relators filed a reply.

On January 8, 2016, Relators filed this amended motion for temporary relief, again seeking a stay of the trial setting of February 8, 2016, contending that a stay is necessary because they will need adequate time to prepare a viable defense before trial, which is now only one month away. Relators further assert they have been prejudiced by "a delay of nearly a month and a half [since this Court's September 28, 2015 Order which] was occasioned by counsel for the Real Party in Interest's alleged lack of notice, which could have been avoided had counsel filed a designation of lead counsel as required by the rules." Relators' Am. Mot. for Temp. Relief at 6 (emphasis in original). Although no response has been filed by the real party in interest in opposition to this amended motion yet, Relators' certificate of compliance indicates that counsel for the real party in interest has been contacted and is opposed to this amended motion for temporary relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(a).

Accordingly, we grant the Relators' amended motion for temporary relief and ORDER that the trial date of February 8, 2016, in the above-referenced trial court cause number is stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the mandamus petition in this Court is finally decided or this Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. See id. Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the stay. See id. at 52.10(c).

It is so ORDERED. Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

[v] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: January 11, 2016


Summaries of

In re TT-Fountains of Tomball, Ltd.

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Jan 11, 2016
Appellate case number: 01-15-00817-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 11, 2016)
Case details for

In re TT-Fountains of Tomball, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:In re TT-Fountains of Tomball, Ltd., incorrectly named as MBS Fountains of…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Jan 11, 2016

Citations

Appellate case number: 01-15-00817-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 11, 2016)