In re Troiani

7 Citing cases

  1. In re M.A.

    No. 12-22-00016-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 28, 2022)

    See id. at 647 n.3. Third, in Troiani, the visiting judge signed a final order on October 10, 2014 and when relator filed her motion for enforcement on June 6, 2016, she included an objection to appointment of the visiting judge presiding over the case; thus, the relator objected before the visiting judge held a hearing on any matter in the enforcement action. In re Troiani, No. 13-17-00204-CV, 2017 WL 2806296, at *1-2 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi June 27, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). In accordance with Canales, we conclude that because M.A. lodged an untimely objection to Judge Marshall's presiding over the modification proceeding, she cannot demonstrate that Judge Marshall abused his discretion by failing to set aside the November 4 order or that Judge Charles abused his discretion by overruling her objection.

  2. In re J.H.K.

    No. 12-21-00153-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 23, 2021)   Cited 2 times

    A petition for modification is a new case or new cause of action under the family code. In re Troiani, No. 13-17-00204-CV, 2017 WL 2806296, at *4 n.3 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi June 27, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Honea, 415 S.W.3d 888, 890-91 (Tex. App.-Eastland 2013, orig. proceeding); see TEX. FAM CODE ANN. § 156.004 (WEST 2014) ("TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE APPLICABLE TO THE FILING OF AN ORIGINAL LAWSUIT APPLY TO A SUIT FOR MODIFICATION UNDER THIS CHAPTER").

  3. In re E.I.N.

    No. 07-20-00292-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2021)

    See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(d). See also In re Troiani, No. 13-17-00204-CV, 2018 Tex.App. LEXIS 6003, at *11 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi June 27, 2017, orig. proceeding) (noting that the trial court's continuing exclusive jurisdiction is not equivalent to, or coordinate with, its plenary jurisdiction). In the underlying case, there were no other unresolved pleadings pending which sought to invoke the trial court's jurisdiction on child support issues.

  4. In re Magnolia Prop. Mgmt.

    NUMBER 13-20-00112-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2020)   Cited 1 times
    Collecting and surveying cases

    proceeding) (per curiam); Flores v. Banner, 932 S.W.2d 500, 501 (Tex. 1996) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Flores, 53 S.W.3d 428, 430 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001, orig. proceeding); see also In re Troiani, No. 13-17-00204-CV, 2017 WL 2806296, at *3 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg June 27, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). III.

  5. Troiani v. Troiani

    NUMBER 13-18-00271-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 24, 2019)

    See Troiani v. Troiani, No. 13-17-00321-CV, 2017 WL 2807388, at *1 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg June 29, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re Troiani, No. 13-17-00204-CV, 2017 WL 3806296, at *5 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg June 27, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (concluding that visiting judge's assignment expired on June 6, 2016, and directing the trial court to vacate orders issued by the visiting judge after that date). The OAG later filed three amended petitions, each revising the alleged arrearage amount.

  6. In re Etheridge

    NUMBER 13-19-00181-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 11, 2019)   Cited 1 times

    proceeding); Flores v. Banner, 932 S.W.2d 500, 501 (Tex. 1996) (orig. proceeding); In re Flores, 53 S.W.3d 428, 430 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2001, orig. proceeding); see also In re Troiani, No. 13-17-00204-CV, 2017 WL 2806296, at *3 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi June 27, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, the record, and the applicable law, and having taken judicial notice of the appeal pending in this Court in cause number 13-18-00648-CV, is of the opinion that relator has not met her burden to obtain relief.

  7. Troiani v. Troiani

    NUMBER 13-17-00321-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 29, 2017)   Cited 1 times

    By memorandum opinion issued in our cause number 13-17-00204-CV, In re Anthony P. Troiani, arising from the same trial court proceeding, this Court conditionally granted a petition for writ of mandamus and directed the Honorable Robert C. Pate to vacate the orders that he has issued since June 6, 2016 and to withdraw from any further proceedings in the matter. See In re Troiani, No. 13-17-00204-CV, 2017 WL ___, at *___ (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi June 27, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Accordingly, this Court has already set aside the rulings now subject to appeal in this case.