From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Toomer, v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 24, 2002
290 A.D.2d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

90220

January 24, 2002.

Derron Toomer pro se.

Peter H. Schiff, for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting possession of contraband and narcotics after a random search of his cell revealed a green, leafy substance hidden in the bottom of a deodorant container. Petitioner was the only resident of the cell, and a subsequent test of the substance was positive for marihuana.

The evidence presented at petitioner's disciplinary hearing included the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who found the contraband and performed the test. Documentation of the testing, also submitted in evidence, sufficiently established the chain of custody and the adequacy of the testing procedure (see, 7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e]; see also, Matter of Burse v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 678, 679).

We conclude that substantial evidence supports the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Laureano v. Senkowski, 277 A.D.2d 613; Matter of Maldonado v. Goord, 270 A.D.2d 742). The claim that he was "set up" by a correction officer against whom petitioner had filed a grievance presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Grof v. Goord, 278 A.D.2d 650). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Toomer, v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 24, 2002
290 A.D.2d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In re Toomer, v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DERRON TOOMER, PETITIONER, V. GLENN GOORD, AS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 24, 2002

Citations

290 A.D.2d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 763

Citing Cases

Williams v. Goord

As to the remaining charges, we find that the determination of petitioner's guilt is supported by substantial…

Sealy v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision

guilty of the charge and the determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78…