Opinion
69510-0-I
07-29-2013
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
PER CURIAM
Randy Tollefsen seeks discretionary review of the trial court decision terminating his release from confinement under RCW 71.09 to a Less Restrictive Alternative (LRA). The trial court certified that the decision warranted review under RAP 2.3(b)(4). Discretionary review is granted, and we accept the State's concession that the trial court erred in using the summary judgment procedure to revoke Mr. Tollefsen's LRA placement. Accordingly, the trial court's decision is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings. Because we have granted discretionary review, we do not address Mr. Tollefsen's claim that the trial court's decision is also appealable as a matter of right under RAP 2.2.
Reversed and remanded.