From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Todd

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Mar 10, 2014
No. 05-13-01750-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 10, 2014)

Opinion

No. 05-13-01750-CV

03-10-2014

IN RE FREDERICK D. TODD, II, M.D., AND FREDERICK D. TODD, II, M.D., P.A. D/B/A ARLINGTON NEUROLOGICAL & SPINE ASSOCIATES, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-08-16167-F


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Brown

Opinion by Justice Moseley

Before the Court is relators' petition for writ of mandamus in which they contend that the trial court clearly abused its discretion in granting a new trial. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus.

_______________

JIM MOSELEY

JUSTICE
131750F.P05


Summaries of

In re Todd

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Mar 10, 2014
No. 05-13-01750-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 10, 2014)
Case details for

In re Todd

Case Details

Full title:IN RE FREDERICK D. TODD, II, M.D., AND FREDERICK D. TODD, II, M.D., P.A…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Mar 10, 2014

Citations

No. 05-13-01750-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 10, 2014)