KS Investments v. T.M. Sweeney & Sons LTL Services, Inc. (In re T.M. Sweeney & Sons LTL Services, Inc.)

1 Citing case

  1. In re Titan Industries, Inc.

    BAP No. MW 00-104 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. Jun. 29, 2001)

    The requirement of providing adequate protection cannot be circumvented. In re T.M. Sweeney Sons LTL Services, Inc., 131 B.R. 984, 990 (Bankr.N.D.Ill. 1991) ("the court can only grant a superpriority' lien on property already subject to a lien if there is adequate protection of the interest of the holder of the lien . . . .'" 11 U.S.C. ยง 364(d)(1)(B)). See also In re Au Natural Restaurant, Inc., 63 B.R. 575, 581 (Bankr.S.D.N Y 1986).