From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tinghino

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 5, 2012
43 A.3d 1160 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

2012-06-5

In the Matter of Lawrence M. TINGHINO, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 034721994).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11–384, concluding that LAWRENCE M. TINGHINO of PARAMUS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), and RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LAWRENCE M. TINGHINO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committeefor appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Tinghino

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 5, 2012
43 A.3d 1160 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Tinghino

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Lawrence M. TINGHINO, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jun 5, 2012

Citations

43 A.3d 1160 (N.J. 2012)
210 N.J. 250

Citing Cases

In re Tyler

The following cases, although not squarely on point, provide a point of comparison. A reprimand was imposed…

In re Tiffany

denial of his motion to reinstate the complaint; the attorney did not inform the minor's parents that the…