From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Thompson

Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jan 31, 2012
NO. 14-12-00018-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 14-12-00018-CR

01-31-2012

IN RE GREGORY THOMPSON, Relator


Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 31, 2011.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1262275


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 10, 2012, relator Gregory Thompson filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator asks this court to compel the respondent, the Honorable Ruben Guerrero, presiding judge of the 174th District Court of Harris County, to grant his motion for a judgment nunc pro tunc filed December 30, 2011, in his underlying felony conviction.

To be entitled to mandamus relief in a criminal case, a relator must show that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act, not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v.Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). Consideration of a motion that is properly filed and before the court is a ministerial act. State ex rel. Curry v. Gray, 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987) (orig. proceeding). A relator must establish the trial court (1) had a legal duty to rule on the motion; (2) was asked to rule on the motion; and (3) failed to do so. In re Keeter, 134 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex. App.—Waco 2003, orig. proceeding); In re Villarreal, 96 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding) (relator must show that trial court received, was aware of, and was asked to rule on motion).

Relator has not provided this court with documentation necessary to support his requested relief. It is relator's burden to provide this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). Relator has not established that that the trial court had a ministerial duty to grant his motion.

Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Jamison and McCally. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

In re Thompson

Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jan 31, 2012
NO. 14-12-00018-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2012)
Case details for

In re Thompson

Case Details

Full title:IN RE GREGORY THOMPSON, Relator

Court:Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

NO. 14-12-00018-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2012)