In re Thomas

Full title: IN RE: C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, Appellant

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 5, 2020

2019-2053 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 5, 2020)

Opinion

2019-2053

03-05-2020

IN RE: C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, Appellant

C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, TI Law Group, PC, San Jose, CA, argued pro se. NICHOLAS THEODORE MATICH, IV, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/253,299.

JUDGMENT

C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, TI Law Group, PC, San Jose, CA, argued pro se. NICHOLAS THEODORE MATICH, IV, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, SCHALL, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 5, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court