From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Thomas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 25, 2013
547 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-2126

11-25-2013

In re: JAY L. THOMAS, Petitioner.

Jay Thomas, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(8:13-cv-02167-DKC)

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jay Thomas, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jay L. Thomas petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his habeas petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the court has dismissed without prejudice Thomas' habeas petition. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Thomas' case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We also grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny Thomas' motion for temporary relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Thomas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 25, 2013
547 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

In re Thomas

Case Details

Full title:In re: JAY L. THOMAS, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 25, 2013

Citations

547 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2013)