From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Thomas

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 13, 2017
2017-1149 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2017)

Opinion

2017-1149

12-13-2017

IN RE: C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, Appellant

C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, IpVenture, Los Altos, CA, argued pro se. FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, JEREMIAH HELM, THOMAS W. KRAUSE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/099,285.

JUDGMENT

C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, IpVenture, Los Altos, CA, argued pro se. FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, JEREMIAH HELM, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and DYK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 13, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Thomas

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 13, 2017
2017-1149 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2017)
Case details for

In re Thomas

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 13, 2017

Citations

2017-1149 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2017)