From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re the Detention of Wilber W

Supreme Court of Arizona
Jan 23, 2003
62 P.3d 126 (Ariz. 2003)

Opinion

Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0328-PR, Court of Appeals, Division One No. 1 CA-MH 01-0008 SP, Mohave County Superior Court No. CV 2000-0152

Filed January 23, 2003.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Mohave County. No. CV 2000-0152. The Honorable James E. Chavez, Judge. REMANDED.

Janet Napolitano, Former Arizona attorney General, Terry Goddard, Attorney General by Randall M. Howe, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section, Phoenix and Diane M. Acosta, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Appeals Section, Tucson, Attorneys for State of Arizona.

Eric J. Engan, P.C. by Eric J. Engan, Kingman, Attorney for Wilber W.


OPINION


¶ 1 We granted review to consider the opinion of the Court of Appeals in light of our decision in In re Leon G., 204 Ariz. 15, 59 P.3d 779 (2002). We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to Article VI, Section 5 of the Arizona Constitution.

¶ 2 Although the analysis in In re Wilber W., 203 Ariz. 301, 53 P.3d 1145 (App. 2002), largely anticipated our decision in In re Leon G., minor areas of disagreement exist between the two decisions. For that reason, we vacates the opinion of the Court of Appeals and remand this matter to the Superior Court for further proceedings consistent with In re Leon G. We also vacate as moot the stay previously entered.

CONCURRING: CHARLES E. JONES, Chief Justice, REBECCA WHITE BERCH and MICHAEL D. RYAN, Justices.


Summaries of

In re the Detention of Wilber W

Supreme Court of Arizona
Jan 23, 2003
62 P.3d 126 (Ariz. 2003)
Case details for

In re the Detention of Wilber W

Case Details

Full title:IN RE THE DETENTION OF: WILBUR W

Court:Supreme Court of Arizona

Date published: Jan 23, 2003

Citations

62 P.3d 126 (Ariz. 2003)
62 P.3d 126

Citing Cases

State v. Gonzales-Perez

ORDER Prior report: App., 204 Ariz. 200, 62 P.3d 126 ORDERED: Petition for Review by Arizona Supreme Court =…

In re Care Treat of Holtcamp v. State

Florida, Arizona, and New Jersey do not require that the suspected predator be presently confined for a…