From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re The Deposit Guarantee Fund (Ukraine)

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 21, 2022
21 Misc. 203 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2022)

Opinion

21 Misc. 203 (AT)

11-21-2022

In re Application of THE DEPOSIT GUARANTEE FUND (UKRAINE), For an Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE

On February 23, 2021, Applicant, The Deposit Guarantee Fund (Ukraine), submitted an ex parte petition for an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to obtain discovery for use in a contemplated civil proceeding in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, Insolvency and Companies List (Chancery Division). ECF No. 1. On April 21, 2021, the Court granted Applicant's petition to serve subpoenas on: Citibank, N.A.; The Bank of New York Mellon; Societe Generale, New York; HSBC Bank USA, N.A.; BNP Paribas USA; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; Barclays Bank PLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas; Bank of Nova Scotia; UBS AG; Bank of America, N.A.; Standard Chartered Bank US; Commerzbank AG US; Bank of China, New York Branch; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and The Clearing House Payments Company LLC (together, the “Respondents”). April Order, ECF No. 7. On October 7, 2021, Applicant requested leave to serve more subpoenas on Respondents, ECF No. 14, and the Court granted that request, ECF No. 17.

Applicant now seeks leave to serve additional subpoenas on Respondents. ECF No. 24. An applicant seeking disclosure under § 1782 must satisfy the requirements of the statute. April Order at 1-2. If it does, the Court then exercises its discretion in light of several pertinent factors to determine whether and to what extent disclosure should be granted. Id. at 2. Here, Applicant satisfies all statutory factors with respect to the present application for the same reasons set forth in the April Order. Id. at 2-3; see also ECF No. 14 at 3-4. The four discretionary factors also weigh in favor of granting the present application for the same reasons discussed in the April Order. Id. at 3-4; see also In re Application of Chevron Corp., 736 F.Supp.2d 773, 779-80 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).

Accordingly, Applicant's motion, ECF No. 24, is GRANTED.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 24.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re The Deposit Guarantee Fund (Ukraine)

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 21, 2022
21 Misc. 203 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2022)
Case details for

In re The Deposit Guarantee Fund (Ukraine)

Case Details

Full title:In re Application of THE DEPOSIT GUARANTEE FUND (UKRAINE), For an Pursuant…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 21, 2022

Citations

21 Misc. 203 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2022)