Opinion
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI MDL No. 1827
10-25-2011
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Case No. 3:11-cv-711 SI STATE OF NEW YORK, by and through, ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Defendants.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General of the State of New York Richard L. Schwartz Acting Bureau Chief, Antitrust Bureau Amy McFarlane Assistant Attorney General Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Plaintiff State of New York PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP JOHN M. GRENFELL JACOB R. SORENSEN FUSAE NARA ANDREW D. LANPHERE John M. Grenfell Attorneys for Defendants SHARP CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA Bar No. 88500)
JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA Bar No. 209134)
FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice)
ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA Bar No. 191479)
Attorneys for Defendants
SHARP CORPORATION and
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING SHARP'S TIME TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT
WHEREAS plaintiff State of New York filed an Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case against Defendants AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. on March 15, 2011, Dkt. no. 2556;
WHEREAS the Court granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint on August 9, 2011;
WHEREAS Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation (together, "Sharp") desire a reasonable amount of time to answer the Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS the Court previously entered Orders extending the time to answer the Amended Complaint on August 25, 2011, as stipulated by Plaintiff and Sharp and on September 13, 2011, as stipulated by Plaintiff and Sharp; and
WHEREAS the requested time modification will not affect any other deadline in this case.
THEREFORE, the State of New York and Sharp hereby agree that Sharp's deadline to answer to the Amended Complaint shall be November 28, 2011.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General of the State of New York
Richard L. Schwartz
Acting Bureau Chief, Antitrust Bureau
Amy McFarlane
Assistant Attorney General
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of New York
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
JOHN M. GRENFELL
JACOB R. SORENSEN
FUSAE NARA
ANDREW D. LANPHERE
John M. Grenfell
Attorneys for Defendants SHARP CORPORATION
and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that the concurrence of the other signatory hereto has been obtained.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Honorable Susan Illston