From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
Nov 4, 2011
CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ

11-04-2011

In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS

Michael R. Lazerwitz (PRO HAC VICE) Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062) Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756) CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. Francis O. Scarpulla (State Bar No. 41059) Craig C. Corbitt (State Bar No. 83251) Judith A. Zahid (State Bar No. 215418) Patrick B. Clayton (State Bar No. 240191) Qianwei Fu (State Bar No. 242669) Heather T. Rankie (State Bar No. 268002) ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL & MASON LLP Joseph M. Alioto (State Bar No. 42680) ALIOTO LAW FIRM Co-Lead Class Counsel for Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs


Michael R. Lazerwitz (PRO HAC VICE)

Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062)

Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756)

CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP

Counsel for Defendants

LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.

LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC.

MDLNO. 1827

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMITS

FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN

SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DECERTIFY

CLASSES OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, on September 8, 2011, defendants filed a motion to decertify the classes or in the alternative for summary judgment (redacted version at ECF No. 3492) (the "Motion"), which is set for hearing on December 9, 2011;

WHEREAS, the parties previously agreed to alter the page limits ordinarily provided by the Local Rules for plaintiffs to file an opposition to the Motion;

WHEREAS, the parties now desire to alter the page limits ordinarily provided by the Local Rules to file reply papers in connection with the Motion;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned counsel on behalf of the Parties identified below, that:

(1) Defendants shall file a reply to Plaintiffs' opposition to the Motion not to exceed 20 pages.

Michael R. Lazerwitz (PRO HAC VICE)

Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062)

Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756)

CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP

Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and

LG Display America, Inc.

Francis O. Scarpulla (State Bar No. 41059)

Craig C. Corbitt (State Bar No. 83251)

Judith A. Zahid (State Bar No. 215418)

Patrick B. Clayton (State Bar No. 240191)

Qianwei Fu (State Bar No. 242669)

Heather T. Rankie (State Bar No. 268002)

ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL & MASON LLP

Joseph M. Alioto (State Bar No. 42680)

ALIOTO LAW FIRM

Co-Lead Class Counsel for Indirect-Purchaser

Plaintiffs
Attestation: The filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

Michael R. Lazerwitz

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation set forth above, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Susan Illston

United States District Judge


Summaries of

In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
Nov 4, 2011
CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)
Case details for

In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates To…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

Date published: Nov 4, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)