From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tex. Capital Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 15, 2024
No. 05-24-00119-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 15, 2024)

Opinion

05-24-00119-CV

02-15-2024

IN RE TEXAS CAPITAL BANK F/K/A TEXAS CAPITAL BANK, N.A., Relator


Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-07128

Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Breedlove

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KEN MOLBERG, JUSTICE

Before the Court is relator's February 6, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus. Relator challenges the trial court's January 19, 2024 Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Compel the Deposition of Rob Holmes.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relator's petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Tex. Capital Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 15, 2024
No. 05-24-00119-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 15, 2024)
Case details for

In re Tex. Capital Bank

Case Details

Full title:IN RE TEXAS CAPITAL BANK F/K/A TEXAS CAPITAL BANK, N.A., Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Feb 15, 2024

Citations

No. 05-24-00119-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 15, 2024)