From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tenace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 12, 1996
234 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 12, 1996.

White, J. Appeal from an amended order of the Family Court of Schenectady County (Griset, J.), entered January 24, 1996, which denied petitioner's motion to vacate a prior order adjudicating him to be a juvenile delinquent.

Before: Mikoll, J.P., Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ.


Fourteen years after an order was entered adjudicating petitioner a juvenile delinquent, he moved to vacate it. Family Court denied the motion on the ground that the time to appeal had expired.

We affirm, but on a different ground. While the right to seek legal redress is broad, it is not without limitations. One limitation is that a party cannot unreasonably and inexcusably delay in seeking relief to the prejudice of the opposing party ( see, Matter of Schulz v State of New York, 81 NY2d 336, 348). In this instance, as petitioner has offered no explanation for his delay which was inherently prejudicial to respondent, the denial of his motion was justified ( see, 75 NY Jur 2d, Limitations and Laches, § 336, at 541).

Ordered that the amended order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Tenace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 12, 1996
234 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Tenace

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID M. TENACE, a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 12, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 897

Citing Cases

Matter of R., Christian

ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances of this case,…

Caldor Corp. v. S Plaza Associates, L.P. (In re Caldor, Inc.)

Pursuant to the equitable doctrine of laches, we may deny relief to a plaintiff who inexcusably and…