In re Telkamp

Full title: IN RE ELOISA GOMEZ TELKAMP, Relator

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Nov 25, 2003

No. 05-03-01614-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 25, 2003)

Opinion

No. 05-03-01614-CV

Opinion Issued November 25, 2003.

Original Proceeding from the 68^th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 02-03787-C.

Before Justices MORRIS, FITZGERALD, and LANG-MIERS.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion By Justice, LANG-MIERS.

The facts of this original proceeding are known to the parties so we do not recite them here. Further, because all dispositive issues are clearly settled in law, we issue this memorandum opinion pursuant to rule 52.8(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(d).

In her petition for writ of mandamus, relator contends the trial court clerk failed to give the trial judge a proposed order drafted by relator. We conclude the Court does not have jurisdiction over this matter. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2004). Relator also contends that a judgment signed by the trial judge is a forgery. We deny relator's request that we order the trial court to sign a new judgment. Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition as to the trial court clerk for want of jurisdiction and DENY relator's petition as to the trial judge on the merits of relator's claims. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a).