From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tehan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1530 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-10-2016

In the Matter of Kamleh S. TEHAN, as Executrix of the Estate of Robert J. Tehan, Deceased, Petitioner–Appellant–Respondent, For Judicial Dissolution of Tehan's Catalog Showrooms, Inc., Respondent–Respondent–Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.).

Barclay Damon, LLP, Syracuse (Jon P. Devendorf of Counsel), for petitioner-appellant-respondent. Steates, Remmell, Steates & Dziekan, Esqs., Utica (Carl S. Dziekan of Counsel), for respondent-respondent-appellant.


Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Patrick F. MacRae, J.), dated April 29, 2015. The order denied respondent's motion to dismiss the petition and for summary judgment and denied in part petitioner's cross motion for partial summary judgment.

Barclay Damon, LLP, Syracuse (Jon P. Devendorf of Counsel), for petitioner-appellant-respondent.

Steates, Remmell, Steates & Dziekan, Esqs., Utica (Carl S. Dziekan of Counsel), for respondent-respondent-appellant.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Tehan (Tehan's Catalog Showrooms, Inc. ) (Appeal No. 2), ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2016 WL 6643398 (Nov. 10, 2016).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal and cross appeal are unanimously dismissed without costs.

WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Tehan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1530 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Tehan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Kamleh S. TEHAN, as Executrix of the Estate of Robert J…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 1530 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7452
40 N.Y.S.3d 342

Citing Cases

Nat'l Air Cargo, Inc. v. Jenner & Block, LLP

In appeal No. 3, plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment of the same court that granted JB's motion.…