Opinion
Case No. 05-00681, Adversary Proceeding No. 05-10081.
January 8, 2007
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
The plaintiff has filed a Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (Docket Entry ("DE") No. 13). The defendant has opposed the motion. The motion fails to state any grounds for granting the motion, and thus violates LBR 9013-1(b)(1) ("All motions shall state with particularity the grounds therefor. . . ."). Accordingly, the motion does not warrant setting a hearing. It is thus
ORDERED that the Motion to Amend Scheduling Order is DENIED without prejudice to the filing of a motion that alleges sufficient grounds to justify amending the scheduling order.