From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tarter

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Apr 3, 2013
64 A.3d 513 (N.J. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-3

In the Matter of Mitchel TARTER, An Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 011262003).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20–15(k) a recommendation in DRB 13–059 that MITCHEL TARTER of METUCHEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2003, be suspended from the practice of law and compelled to pay a monetary sanction to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for failure to comply with the Stipulation of Settlement entered into with the District VIII Fee Arbitration Committee in Docket No. VIII–2011–0049F, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MITCHEL TARTER be temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective May 1, 2013, and until respondent complies with the Stipulation of Settlement with the District VIII Fee Arbitration Committee in Docket No. VIII–2011–0049F and pays a sanction of $500 to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee; provided, however, this Order shall be vacated automatically if prior to the effective date of the suspension, the Disciplinary Review Board reports to the Court that respondent has satisfied all obligations under this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that if respondent seeks to be heard on this matter, he shall file with the Clerk of the Court within ten days of the file date of this Order a written request for the issuance of an Order to Show Cause; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20–20.


Summaries of

In re Tarter

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Apr 3, 2013
64 A.3d 513 (N.J. 2013)
Case details for

In re Tarter

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Mitchel TARTER, An Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

64 A.3d 513 (N.J. 2013)
213 N.J. 423

Citing Cases

In re Suarez-Silverio

Attorneys who mishandle multiple client matters generally receive a term of suspension. See, e.g., In re…

In re Albano

sues at the time of the misconduct); In re McBride, 188 N.J. 389 (2006) (reprimand for misconduct in five…