From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tarkington

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Sep 23, 2021
No. 03-21-00361-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 23, 2021)

Opinion

03-21-00361-CV

09-23-2021

In re Patrick Earl Tarkington


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Edward Smith, Justice

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court's failure to grant his trial attorney's motion to withdraw. This Court subsequently received a copy of the trial court's docket sheet, indicating that the motion to withdraw has been granted. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) ("A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings ...."). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.


Summaries of

In re Tarkington

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Sep 23, 2021
No. 03-21-00361-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 23, 2021)
Case details for

In re Tarkington

Case Details

Full title:In re Patrick Earl Tarkington

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Sep 23, 2021

Citations

No. 03-21-00361-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 23, 2021)