From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re T. N.A.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 17, 2014
No. 05-14-00710-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2014)

Opinion

No. 05-14-00710-CV

10-17-2014

IN THE INTEREST OF T.N.A., ET AL., CHILDREN.


On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 12-1094-W-304

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, FitzGerald, and Stoddart
Opinion by Justice FitzGerald

The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services filed suit to terminate the parental rights of appellant T.D.A. with respect to her seven children. During the litigation, appellant signed a mediated settlement agreement in which she agreed to the termination of her parental rights. After a hearing, the trial judge signed a decree terminating appellant's parental rights.

Appellant appealed, and counsel was appointed to represent her on appeal. Appellate counsel then filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw, averring that the appeal is wholly without merit and is frivolous. The Anders brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. Counsel certified that she had delivered a copy of the brief to appellant and informed appellant of her right to review the record and file a response. Appellant filed a one-page letter response.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The Anders procedure applies in termination of parental rights cases. In re D.D., 279 S.W.3d 849, 850 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, pet. denied).

See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).

We have reviewed the record, the Anders brief, and appellant's response. We agree with counsel's assessment that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases).
--------

We affirm the trial court's judgment and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. 140710F.P05

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/

KERRY P. FITZGERALD

JUSTICE

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 12-1094-W-304.
Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald. Justices O'Neill and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.


Summaries of

In re T. N.A.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 17, 2014
No. 05-14-00710-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2014)
Case details for

In re T. N.A.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF T.N.A., ET AL., CHILDREN.

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Oct 17, 2014

Citations

No. 05-14-00710-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2014)