From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sullivan

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jul 25, 2012
NO. 02-12-00295-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 25, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-12-00295-CV

07-25-2012

IN RE WILLIAM SULLIVAN RELATOR


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).

The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

The relator complains that the respondent has failed to hold a hearing on his pro se application for writ of habeas corpus bond reduction, but the trial court clerk has indicated that relator is still represented by appointed counsel and that there is no motion to withdraw on file. See Ex parte Bohannan, 350 S.W.3d 116, 116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (noting that when an applicant is represented by counsel, he is not entitled to hybrid representation, and the court can disregard his pro se submissions and take no action on them).
--------

PER CURIAM PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Sullivan

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jul 25, 2012
NO. 02-12-00295-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 25, 2012)
Case details for

In re Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:IN RE WILLIAM SULLIVAN RELATOR

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jul 25, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-12-00295-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 25, 2012)