From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sukwa Sincere G. v. Shamiqua Latisha S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 25, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

5819.

Decided on October 25, 2011.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about May 17, 2010, which, inter alia, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights to the subject child, and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Daniel R. Katz, New York, for appellant.

Magovern Sclafani, New York (Frederick J. Magovern of counsel), for respondents.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Judith Waksberg of counsel), and Kasowitz, Benson, Torres Friedman LLP, New York (David A. Lewis of counsel), attorneys for the child.

Tom, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


The finding of permanent neglect was supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see Social Services Law § 384-b[a]). The record shows that the agency acted diligently by issuing several referrals for the mother to attend programs mandated by her service plan, and caseworkers repeatedly reminded the mother of her need to complete the programs in order to regain custody. Despite these diligent efforts, in the four years since the child's removal, the mother failed to complete her service plan in that she did not complete mental health treatment and never enrolled in a drug treatment program ( see Matter of Aniya Evelyn R. [Yolanda R.] , 77 AD3d 593 ; Matter of Lady Justice I. , 50 AD3d 425 ).

A preponderance of the evidence establishes that the best interests of the child were served by the termination of the mother's parental rights ( Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148). The evidence demonstrated that the child had been provided a loving and stable home environment by his paternal grandmother, who wished to adopt him. Furthermore, contrary to the mother's contention, a suspended judgment was not warranted under the circumstances ( see Matter of Michael B., 80 NY2d 299, 311).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Sukwa Sincere G. v. Shamiqua Latisha S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 25, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Sukwa Sincere G. v. Shamiqua Latisha S.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE SUKWA SINCERE G., A DEPENDENT CHILD UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)