From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Stolz

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Feb 5, 2015
108 A.3d 1249 (D.C. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14–BG–1167.

2015-02-5

In re Jared E. STOLZ, Respondent.


Bar Registration No. 489626, BDN: 126–14.
BEFORE: THOMPSON, Associate Judge, and FERREN and FARRELL, Senior Judges.

ORDER


PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of New Jersey for a period of three months and until further order of the court, this court's November 4, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why the functional equivalent reciprocal discipline in the form of a three-month suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Jared E. Stolz is hereby suspended for a period of three months with reinstatement conditioned on a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent's suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.


Summaries of

In re Stolz

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Feb 5, 2015
108 A.3d 1249 (D.C. 2015)
Case details for

In re Stolz

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: JARED E. STOLZ, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 489626

Court:DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Feb 5, 2015

Citations

108 A.3d 1249 (D.C. 2015)