From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Stinson

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 14, 2007
No. 03-07-00406-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 14, 2007)

Opinion

No. 03-07-00406-CV

Filed: August 14, 2007.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices WALDROP and HENSON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Kelly Stinson petitioned the Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to act on his motion to protect documents in State custody that are the subject of pending litigation. Counsel for the Board of Pardons and Paroles, the real party in interest, has assured the Court that the documents are either not subject to or are exempt from the two-year destruction provision of the records retention schedule. Counsel assures the Court that all documents in question will be maintained. With this assurance, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Stinson

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 14, 2007
No. 03-07-00406-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 14, 2007)
Case details for

In re Stinson

Case Details

Full title:In re Kelly Stinson

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Aug 14, 2007

Citations

No. 03-07-00406-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 14, 2007)