From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Stewart

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Jan 11, 2012
No. 10-11-00472-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 11, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-11-00472-CR

01-11-2012

IN RE JULIUS STEWART


Original Proceeding


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The application (petition) for writ of mandamus is denied.

The application has numerous procedural deficiencies. It lacks all of the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3 and, other than citation references to judicial recusal and disqualification, fails to inform the Court of the nature of the proceeding and the identity of the parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3. It lacks a record. See id. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). It lacks proof of service on the Respondent(s) and the Real-Party-in-Interest, and it is not signed by the relator. See id. 9.1, 9.5, 52.2. Because of our disposition and to expedite it, we will implement Rule 2 and suspend these rules. Id. 2.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Do not publish

[OT06]


Summaries of

In re Stewart

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Jan 11, 2012
No. 10-11-00472-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 11, 2012)
Case details for

In re Stewart

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JULIUS STEWART

Court:TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Jan 11, 2012

Citations

No. 10-11-00472-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 11, 2012)