From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Stephens

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky, London Division
May 21, 2010
CASE NO. 09-60326, ADV. NO. 09-6065 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. May. 21, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 09-60326, ADV. NO. 09-6065.

May 21, 2010


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter having come before the Court and a trial having been held on May 19, 2010, and the matter having been taken under submission, the Court hereby issues this Memorandum Opinion.

Bank of McCreary County ("Plaintiff") objects to the dischargebility of debts of each of the Debtors. Penny L. Stephens has already signed an agreed judgment that the debt is non-dischargeable as to her. Thus, the sole issue is whether the debt is non-dischargeable as to Carl B. Stephens.

At the trial, the Court ordered that the Defendant was not allowed to present testimony or evidence for failure to comply with the Court's Order for Trial. Additionally, Carl B. Stephens failed to show at the trial.

At the conclusion of the trial, the Court ruled from the bench that the following causes of action are dismissed: 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(B), 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6), 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A) and 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A). The Court also ruled from the bench that the debt of Carl B. Stephens is non-dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A).

This Memorandum Opinion is written to establish Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

This Court has jurisdiction over this adversary proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157, 1334 and 1471. This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1409.

Facts

Defendant Carl B. Stephens owes Plaintiff $128,911.87. The debt is for false invoices submitted by Penny L. Stephens. She has previously entered into a guilty plea regarding those false invoices.

The evidence at the trial is sufficient to establish that Carl B. Stephens must have known that Penny L. Stephens was obtaining money from the bank by submitting false invoices. That evidence included, inter alia, that money was obtained by submitting false invoices when Carl B. Stephens was not working, and that those invoices were submitted by Penny L. Stephens pursuant to a power of attorney that Carl B. Stephens had given her.

Conclusions of Law

11. U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) excepts from discharge money obtained by actual fraud. Here, Penny L. Stephens obtained money by submitting fraudulent invoices. The evidence is that Carl B. Stephens knew of and participated in the fraud.

For that reason, Carl B. Stephen's debt to Defendant shall not be discharged. This Memorandum Opinion contains the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. A separate Judgment Order shall be entered. The affixing of this Court's electronic seal below is proof this document has been signed by the Judge and electronically entered by the Clerk in the official record of this case.


Summaries of

In re Stephens

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky, London Division
May 21, 2010
CASE NO. 09-60326, ADV. NO. 09-6065 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. May. 21, 2010)
Case details for

In re Stephens

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: CARL B STEPHENS and PENNY L STEPHENS DEBTORS BANK OF McCREARY…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky, London Division

Date published: May 21, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 09-60326, ADV. NO. 09-6065 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. May. 21, 2010)