From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Stein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 14, 2008
54 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 502868.

August 14, 2008.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2002. He was previously admitted to the Tennessee bar in 1963 and maintains an office for the practice of law in Memphis, Tennessee.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Geoffrey E. Major of counsel), for petitioner.

Brett B. Stein, Memphis, Tennessee, respondent pro se.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ.


By order dated April 11, 2008, the Supreme Court of Tennessee accepted respondent's conditional guilty plea and censured him for failing to challenge the state's case or present evidence on behalf of his client at a juvenile court hearing. Petitioner now moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline upon respondent ( see 22 NYCRR 806.19).

Respondent has submitted papers in opposition which do not establish any of the available defenses to reciprocal discipline ( see 22 NYCRR 806.19 [d]). We therefore grant petitioner's motion and further conclude that respondent should be reciprocally censured.

Ordered that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is censured.


Summaries of

In re Stein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 14, 2008
54 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Stein

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BRETT B. STEIN, an Attorney, Respondent. COMMITTEE ON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 14, 2008

Citations

54 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 6619
862 N.Y.S.2d 299