From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Steig

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 9, 2015
117 A.3d 173 (N.J. 2015)

Opinion

07-09-2015

In the Matter of A.B. STEIG, a/k/a A. Bret Steig, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 039911992).


ORDER

A.B. STEIG, a/k/a A. BRET STEIG, of MORRISTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that A.B. STEIG, a/k/a A. BRET STEIG, is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent's name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by A.B. STEIG, a/k/a A. BRET STEIG, pursuant to Rule 1:21–6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20–20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Steig

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 9, 2015
117 A.3d 173 (N.J. 2015)
Case details for

In re Steig

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of A.B. STEIG, a/k/a A. Bret Steig, an Attorney at Law…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jul 9, 2015

Citations

117 A.3d 173 (N.J. 2015)
222 N.J. 20

Citing Cases

In re Steig

By order entered September 24, 2009, respondent was suspended in this state based upon his failure to…