From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re State Ques. No. 349, Petition No. 249

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 30, 1950
223 P.2d 756 (Okla. 1950)

Opinion

No. 34901.

October 30, 1950.

(Syllabus.)

STATUTES — Initiated measure — Procedure upon disapproval of ballot title by Attorney General — Decision on appeal to Supreme Court. Where Attorney General disapproves the ballot title submitted by proponent of an initiated measure, and prepares and files a title with the Secretary of State, any person may appeal to this court from the title so prepared and submitted; this court, on appeal, may approve said title, or may approve a substitute title offered by appellant, or may prepare one.

Appeal from a proposed ballot title prepared by the Attorney General for the submission of State Question No. 349, Initiative Petition 249. Ballot title as stated in the opinion approved.

Harry T. Hudson, Jr., of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and A.J. Moore, of Oklahoma City, for defendant and appellee.


This is an appeal by plaintiff upon the question of the sufficiency of the proposed ballot title submitted by the Attorney General upon State Question No. 349.

Where the Attorney General disapproves the ballot title submitted by proponent of an initiated measure, and prepares and files a title with the Secretary of State, any person may appeal to this court from the title so prepared and submitted; this court, on appeal, may approve said title, or may approve a substitute title offered by appellant, or may prepare one.

All parties agree that the following title is wholly sufficient under the requirements of 34 O.S. 1941 § 9[ 34-9].

"State Question No. 349 "Initiative Petition No. 249

"The Gist Of The Proposition Is As Follows

"Shall an Act amending 68 O.S. 1941 Section 1251 [68-1251] c [68-1251 c], to increase the tax rate from two percent to three percent upon the gross proceeds of sales to consumers or users; amending 56 O.S. 1941 Section 180[ 56-180], by reducing maximum payable from State Assistance Fund for administering Oklahoma Social Security Act from five to three and one-half percent of total assistance grants; amending 68 O.S. 1941 Section 1251[68-1251] b [68-1251 b], by increasing revenues payable to State Assistance Fund under Sales Tax Act from ninety seven to ninety eight percent and decreasing balance payable to Tax Commission Fund, be approved by the people?

Shall the proposed Act be Approved?

Yes

No "

We agree, and the same is approved.


Summaries of

In re State Ques. No. 349, Petition No. 249

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 30, 1950
223 P.2d 756 (Okla. 1950)
Case details for

In re State Ques. No. 349, Petition No. 249

Case Details

Full title:In re STATE QUESTION NO. 349, INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 249. ASHTON v…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 30, 1950

Citations

223 P.2d 756 (Okla. 1950)
203 Okla. 520

Citing Cases

Covey v. Williamson

"(2) In such circumstances it has been held by this court that the title prepared by the Attorney General…