From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Sep 8, 2022
No. 01-22-00619-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2022)

Opinion

01-22-00619-CV

09-08-2022

In re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company


458th District Court of Fort Bend County Trial court case number: 20-DCV-278448

ORDER

Amparo Guerra J.

Relator, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by denying relator's "Motion to Quash, Objection, and Motion for Protective Order," in connection with three depositions noticed by real party in interest, Willem Ghijsen. Relator also filed a motion for temporary relief, requesting that, pending resolution of this mandamus proceeding, the Court enter an order "to stay the trial court's order compelling three State Farm depositions" that are the subject of the mandamus petition.

Relator's motion for temporary relief is granted. The depositions, requested by real party in interest, of Erica King, Bradley Bates, and of a corporate representative of relator, are stayed pending resolution of this petition for writ of mandamus or further order of this Court.

Additionally, on August 31, 2022, counsel for real party in interest filed a letter with the Clerk of this Court notifying the Court that real party in interest did not intend to file a response to relator's petition for writ of mandamus "unless requested to do so by the Court." The Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. In addition to addressing the issues raised in relator's petition for writ of mandamus, the Court specifically requests that real party in interest respond to relator's argument that "Topic D" of the proposed corporate representative deposition topics is "disproportionate to the needs of this case." The response, if any, is due within twenty days of the date of this order.

"Topic D" requests relator to designate an individual with knowledge regarding "[t]he manner in which Autosource reports, similar to the report attached [to the First Amended Notice of Intention to Take Oral Deposition of a corporate representative of relator], were utilized by [relator] in handling the claim that is the subject of [the underlying] proceeding and in the handling of similar claims adjusted by [relator] from November 2019 through the present date."

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Sep 8, 2022
No. 01-22-00619-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2022)
Case details for

In re State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:In re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Sep 8, 2022

Citations

No. 01-22-00619-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2022)