From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re State Farm Lloyds

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Nov 13, 2014
Cause number: 01-14-00850-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2014)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-14-00850-CV

11-13-2014

In re State Farm Lloyds, Antone Eugene Jones, and Gregory Latty


ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motions: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus Parties filing motions: Real Party in Interest Document to be filed: Response Ordered that motion is:

[v] Granted



If document is to be filed, document due: December 10, 2014



[v] No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.



[ ] Denied



[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)



[v] Other:



The unopposed motion to abate this case is denied, but the alternative motion for extension of time to file response to petition for writ of mandamus is granted, but counsel is warned that no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Laura C. Higley

[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court
Date: November 13, 2014 November 7, 2008 Revision


Summaries of

In re State Farm Lloyds

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Nov 13, 2014
Cause number: 01-14-00850-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2014)
Case details for

In re State Farm Lloyds

Case Details

Full title:In re State Farm Lloyds, Antone Eugene Jones, and Gregory Latty

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Nov 13, 2014

Citations

Cause number: 01-14-00850-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2014)